Tuesday, August 14, 2012

Transition some military spending to new energy technologies

There is plenty of discussion on the budget and the deficit and the debt.  There are competing viewpoints on what to do about it.  The "jobs" issue adds a very powerful influence on the debate.  The deficit hawks want to cut spending, but do not want to add revenue to the mix, having an aversion to raising taxes, especially on the wealthy they see as the job creators.

The inconsistency in this argument comes when there is a discussion of the Defense budget.  The deficit hawks are also defense hawks.  They talk about our need to provide for national security.  The military has programs that they would like to discontinue but Congress keeps them going.  Why?  Because it is a jobs thing.  They are really most concerned about how cuts will affect the Military Industrial Complex, specifically those military contractors in their districts.  The military has conveniently spread the wealth of their contracts nationwide so each congressperson has their own district's jobs to protect.

So, my idea is to create a system that transitions a percentage of military contracts to civilian purposes that aid in non-military national security advancement by way of energy independence, keeping these coddled contractors employing their people while moving us forward as a country.

One example of this would be to convert to progressive energy production and efficiency projects.  Solar Photo Voltaic and LED lighting production are examples.  If manufacturers could quickly retrofit factories during World War II we can do it now. 

We spend so much more than the rest of the world on the military, we can afford to cut back on that spending and re-purpose it for our future and keep people employed at the same time.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please share your thoughts by commenting on my blog.